To find out more about the podcast go to Science leads the way at Davos.
Below is a short summary and detailed review of this podcast written by FutureFactual:
The Naked Scientists at Davos: Frontiers Science House, Immuneome Project, Fusion Energy, and Diversified Agriculture
Introduction and Davos Context
The Naked Scientists present a Davos edition focused on translating science into policy and business action. The World Economic Forum in Davos gathers global leaders to discuss technology, economics, and geopolitics, with Frontiers announcing the Frontiers Science House as a hub to connect science directly with decision-makers. The aim is to bring scientists and business leaders to the same table to discuss how science can help plan the future of organizations and nations.
The episode frames a broader theme: strong leadership requires informed, forward-looking dialogue about how emerging technologies will converge and shape society, health, energy, and the environment. Fred Venter from Frontiers discusses the Science House as a catalyst for change, inviting listeners to see science as a core consideration in strategic decisions.
Quote: “Bringing science directly into this community of leaders that gather every year in Davos.” - Fred Venter
Frontiers Science House and Immunology: Jane Metcalf
We hear from Jane Metcalf, executive chair of the Human Immunome Project, which aims to decode and model the immune system using a 3D, time-evolving model that integrates molecules, cells, tissues, and microbiome interactions. The project envisions a five-year plan to sample individuals repeatedly to build baseline immune states and monitor functional responses, allowing predictions about aging, vaccines, and immune resilience. Metcalf emphasizes systems biology and big data as tools to reveal interactions across the immune system and to translate science into clinical practice, including patient-facing readouts and decision support.
She explains the vision of a 3D, four-dimensional immune model that evolves with age, emphasizing how vaccines and threats reveal which immune soldiers appear for battle. The conversation draws a parallel with the Human Genome Project, underscoring the need for translational experts who can translate complex data into clinician-ready or public-facing insights.
Quote: “Genes are not fate, so just because you have a gene doesn't necessarily mean you will get sick.” - Jane Metcalf
Fusion Energy: Peter Rose of Novatron Fusion
The discussion moves to energy futures with Peter Rose, CEO of Novatron Fusion, who outlines an approach to industrialize fusion. Rose argues fusion could provide safe, abundant, baseload power, and explains the concept of magnetic confinement with a self-stabilizing configuration that reduces the engineering complexity seen in other designs. He describes the Norton device in Stockholm and reports positive results from a year of experiments, signaling renewed optimism about fusion's timeline.
On timing, Rose cautions that finance, regulation, and international partnerships are critical for scaling fusion to grid-ready energy, targeting readiness by 2040 and possibly earlier if commitments align. The interview frames fusion as not only a scientific breakthrough but a global energy and equity issue, emphasizing access for regions currently lacking reliable power.
Quote: “We will be able to produce energy to the grid before 2040.” - Peter Rose
Diversified Agriculture: Zia Marabi
Next, Zia Marabi from the University of Colorado Boulder discusses diversified agriculture as a nature-inspired alternative to monocultures. He argues that ecosystems rely on mixtures and interactions that reduce pest pressure, improve soil health, and lower chemical inputs. He cites examples like the Three Sisters system and intercropping strategies that can dramatically boost yields and environmental outcomes. Marabi acknowledges economic realities for farmers, price pressures, and the need for policy and market structures that support diversified systems. He highlights evidence from research collaborations, including Rothamsted Research, showing potential yield gains and reduced pesticide use through intercropping and ecosystem-based design.
The dialogue centers on how agricultural research and industry players could package seeds and microbial products to create resilient agroecosystems, aligning profit with ecological health. The World Economic Forum is framed as a space where farming businesses can rethink practices, subsidies, and collaboration with scientists to reimagine agricultural packages that mimic natural ecosystems.
Quote: “research dollars put towards that came up with this innovative system that tripled farmers' yields.” - Zia Marabi
Closing: Outcomes and Next Steps
The episode closes with reflections on how Frontier Science House can influence leadership decisions and accelerate science-based policy. Fred Venter expresses optimism that Davos participants will leave with a stronger sense that science must be central to future planning. The program signals a broader shift toward integrating science into governance, industry, and global equity in energy and food systems.
Quote: "Bringing science directly into this community of leaders that gather every year in Davos." - Fred Venter
